12. Era of Militant Nationalism (1905-1909)
Growth of Militant Nationalism
Militant Nationalism
- Emerged 1890s, solidified by 1905 with revolutionary wing
- Catalysts: British intransigence, economic exploitation, repressive legislation
- Government taking rights away instead of granting more
- 1892: Indian Councils Act criticized for failing to satisfy nationalists
- 1897: Natu brothers deported without trial, Tilak imprisoned
- 1898: Repressive laws under IPC Section 124A, 156A amplified
- 1899: Indian members in Calcutta Corporation reduced
- 1904
- Official Secrets Act curbed press freedom
- Indian Universities Act increased government control over universities
- Famines (1896-1900) killed 90 lakh people, exposed colonial exploitation
- 1896-1897 Famine: Failed monsoons → drought → 1-3M deaths across Central India, inadequate relief due to laissez-faire policies
- 1899-1900 Bombay Famine: Monsoon failure → 1-4.5M deaths, ineffective relief worsened by taxation, grain exports
- Counter nationalist infiltration into national universities
- Suppress any activity deemed in opposition to British interest
- Effectively criminalise espionage
- Used to curb press and political dissent
- Deals with the offense of sedition
Ideological Foundations
- Self-reliance philosophy from Tilak, Aurobindo, Pal
- Education spread awareness while creating educated unemployed class which drew attention to poverty and underdeveloped state of the country's economy
- International examples
- Japan's rise (1868: Meiji Restoration, 1905: Victory over Russia)
- European military defeats (1896: Ethiopians over Italian Army, 1899-1902: Boers Wars)
- Reaction against westernisation led by Indian intellectuals
- Dissatisfaction with moderate "Three P's" approach → Prayer, Petition, Protest
Militant School
- Leaders (Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Aurobindo Ghosh) across regions united in approach
- Core principles
- Self-reliance
- Swaraj
- Direct action
- Mass participation
- Curzon's policies (especially Bengal partition) confirmed British hostility
- New leadership channeled mass potential against colonial rule
Swadeshi and Boycott Movement
- Dec 1903: Originated from anti-partition movement against British decision to divide Bengal (July 1905: Actual Division)
- Western Bengal (Hindu majority) → Calcutta capital
- Eastern Bengal (Muslim majority) → Dacca capital
- British motive: Weaken Bengali nationalism by dividing population by language and religion
- Curzon promoted Dacca to appease Muslims, continuing divide-and-rule policy
Movement Development (1903-1905)
- Moderate leaders (Banerjee, Mitra, Ray) used petitions, meetings, newspapers for protest
- 1905
-
7 August
- Boycott Resolution passed at Calcutta Townhall
- Formation Proclamation of Swadeshi Movement made
- Boycott of Manchester cloth + Liverpool salt
-
October
- Partition implemented; public observed mourning, sang Bande Mataram + Amar Sonar Bangla
- Rakhibandhan day celebrated as unity symbol
-
- Movement raised ₹50,000
- Spread to
- Poona, Bombay: Tilak
- Punjab: Lala Lajpat Rai
- Delhi: Syed Haider Raza
- Madras: Chidambaram Pillai
Congress Response
- 1905: Congress under Gokhale supported anti-partition and Swadeshi Movement
- Militants (Tilak, Rai, Pal, Ghosh) advocated nationwide mass struggle for swaraj
- 1906: Congress under Prominent Men#Dadabhai Naroji declared self-government / swaraj goal (like colonies of Australia and Canada)
- 1907: Moderates-Extremists split at Surat session over movement tactics
Movement under Extremist Leadership
- Extremists dominated Swadeshi Movement after Moderate failure
- Government suppression: student atrocities, banned Vande Mataram, restricted meetings
Extremist Programme (1906)
- Naoroji declared self-government as goal (Congress 1906 session at Calcutta)
- Passive resistance beyond swadeshi → boycott government institutions
- Purpose: paralyse British administration through organized refusal
- Aurobindo: "Political freedom is the life breath of a nation"
Struggle Methods
- Boycott: foreign goods, public burnings, salt/sugar boycott
- Mass mobilization
- Public meetings
- Volunteer corps
- Samitis
- Swadesh Bandhab Samiti: Ashwini Kumar Dutta
- Swadeshi Sangam: V.O. Chidambaram Pillai
- Cultural tools: traditional festivals (Tilak's Ganpati and Shivaji festivals), nationalist songs/art
- Self-reliance (atma shakti): village regeneration, social reform (against caste oppression, early marriage, dowry system)
- Education: national schools established, vernacular medium
- Swadeshi enterprises: textile mills, factories, banks
Swadeshi National Education Movement
- British suppression triggered boycott of colonial educational institutions
- Raja Subodh Mullick donated ₹100,000 for national schools
- 1906: National Council of Education established Bengal National College and Bengal Technical Institute
- Bengal National College
- Principal: Aurobindo Ghosh
- President: Rashbehari Ghosh
- Education delivered through vernacular medium
Swadeshi Enterprises
- 1893: Bengal Chemicals established by Prafullachandra Ray
- 1897: Dawn: Satishchandra Mukherjee's: Promoted self-reliance #Ind_Publications
- 1904: Sakharam Ganesh Deuskar's banned book Chapter 12 - 17#^Desher-Katha sold 15,000 copies
- Indigenous businesses established: textile mills, factories, banks
- Enterprises driven by patriotism rather than business expertise
- V.O. Chidambaram Pillai's Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company at Tuticorin TN challenged British monopoly
- Written in Bengali
- Warned against the hypnotic conquest of the mind by colonial powers encouraging Indians to break free from mental subjugation
- Inspired the performance of swadeshi street plays and folk songs, promoting indigenous culture and resistance through art
- Desh: Used in pan Indian context
Cultural Renaissance
- Tagore's Amar Sonar Bangla (later Bangladesh national anthem) Subramania Bharati's Sudesha Geetham inspired nationalist movement
- 1907: Indian Society of Oriental Art established by Abanindra Nath Tagore, revolutionised Indian art beyond Victorian influences →16. Indian Paintings#^Nandlal-Bose
- Indian scientists (Jagdish Chandra Bose, Prafullachandra Roy) pioneered original research with global impact
Mass Participation
- Students led swadeshi promotion, shop picketing; faced severe penalties
- Movement strong in Bengal, Maharashtra, South India
- Women, especially urban middle-class, joined protests, gained significant role
- Muslims divided: some leaders participated (Abdul Rasul, Liaqat Hussain, Guzanvi, Maulana Azad) while majority stayed away (led by Nawab Salimullah who supported partition for Muslim-majority East Bengal)
- 1906: All-India Muslim League formed as anti-Congress front
- Labor strikes (1905-1908): Bengali clerks, railway workers, jute mills protested
- Movement expanded to diverse social groups but failed with Muslim peasantry
Annulment of Partition
- 1911
- Delhi Durbar under Viceroy Hardinge II
- Bengal partition annulled
- Capital shifted to Delhi
- Bihar and Orissa separated from Bengal, Assam made separate province
- Attempt to bomb Lord Hardinge was after Delhi Durbar → Chapter 12 - 17#^Delhi-Conspiracy-Trial
Evaluation of Swadeshi Movement
Movement fizzles out
- 1908: Movement fizzled out
- Decline factors
- Government repression
- Organisational failure
- Leadership arrests / Deportation; Aurobindo Ghosh + Bipin Chandra Pal retired from active politics
- Internal conflicts; Surat Split etc
- Limited class reach
- Theoretical resistance
Movement a Turning Point
- Historical significance
- Turning point expanding beyond politics to culture/industry
- Awakened political consciousness
- Undermined colonial ideas
- Ideological transition
- Moderate petition politics (failed to connect with younger generation and masses) → Extremist mass mobilization (emphasized mass participation and broader social base)
- Extremist ideology lacked consistency (Aurobindo - Complete Independence, Tilak - Some sort of self govt)
- Religious revivalism alienated Muslims and created unhealthy politics-religion relationship
Moderates vs Extremists
| Dimension | Moderates | Extremists |
|---|---|---|
| Social base | Zamindars and upper middle classes in towns | Educated middle and lower middle classes in towns |
| Ideological inspiration | Western liberal thought and European history | Indian history, cultural heritage, and Hindu traditional symbols |
| View of British mission | Believed in England's providential mission in India | Rejected 'providential mission theory' as an illusion |
| Political relations with Britain | Believed political connections with Britain to be in India's social, political, and cultural interests | Believed that political connections with Britain would perpetuate British exploitation of India |
| Loyalty to British Crown | Professed loyalty to the British Crown | Believed that the British Crown was unworthy of claiming Indian loyalty |
| Mass participation | Believed that the movement should be limited to middle-class intelligentsia; masses not yet ready for participation in political work | Had immense faith in the capacity of masses to participate and to make sacrifices |
| Political demands | Demanded constitutional reforms and share for Indians in services | Demanded swaraj as the panacea for Indian ills |
| Methods of struggle | Insisted on the use of constitutional methods only | Did not hesitate to use extra-constitutional methods like boycott and passive resistance to achieve their objectives |
| Patriotism | They were patriots and did not play the role of a comprador class | They were patriots who made sacrifices for the sake of the country |
Surat Split 1907
- The Surat Split (1907)
- Congress divided during revolutionary momentum period
- Stemmed from ideological differences between Moderates and Extremists
- Ideological Divide (1905-1907)
- Extremists: Expanded boycott beyond Bengal, aggressive resistance, Tilak/Lajpat Rai leadership
- Moderates: Constitutional methods, limited boycott, council reforms participation
- 1906 Calcutta compromise: Naoroji presidency, swarajya goal established (Swaraj mentioned first time)
Split Takes Place
- Extremists wanted Nagpur session with Tilak as president
- Moderates moved meeting to Surat, proposed Rashbehari Ghosh as President, dropped key resolutions (Ultimately Rashbehari Ghosh was chosen as President)
- Both sides adopted rigid positions making compromise impossible
- Moderates retained control of Congress organization
Government Response
- Five repressive laws (1907-1911) targeting anti-government activity
- Seditious Meetings Act, Indian Newspapers Act, Incitement to Offences Act, Criminal Law Amendment Act, Indian Press Act
- Kesari: Tilak: Imprisoned (1909-1914) for sedition (for writings in it #Ind_Publications
- Key Extremist leaders (Aurobindo Ghosh, BC Pal retired, Lajpat Rai left abroad) sidelined through retirement or exile
- Extremists failed to organize alternative party, Moderates left without popular support
- National movement declined until Tilak's 1914 release
The Government Strategy
- Hostile to Congress despite Moderates distancing from militants
- Implemented carrot and stick policy after Swadeshi Movement
- Three-pronged approach: repression-conciliation-suppression
- First stage: Extremists repressed to frighten Moderates
- Second stage: Moderates placated through concessions
- Strategy aimed to isolate Extremists while bringing Moderates to government side
Morley-Minto Reforms (1909)
- 1906
- Simla Deputation demanded Muslim separate electorates
- Prominent Men#Gopal Krishna Gokhale presented Congress demands
Morley Minto Reforms
- Viceroy Minto and Morley created reforms to placate Moderates and Muslims
- Indian Councils Act 1909 (Morley Minto Reforms) established:
- Representation Structure
- Separate electorates for Muslims with excess representation (first time)
- Imperial Legislative Council: 69 members (37 officials, 32 non-officials)
- Provincial councils given non-official majority (though non-elected majority remained)
- One Indian appointed to Viceroy's executive council (Satyendra Sinha, 1909)
- Electoral System
- Indirect elections (Local bodies
Electoral College Provincial Legislature members Central Legislature members) - Muslim voters given lower income qualification than Hindus
- Reserved seats: 8 for Muslims, 4 for British capitalists, 2 for landlords, 13 general
- Indirect elections (Local bodies
- Powers and Limitations
- Legislative powers expanded at central and provincial levels
- Could pass resolutions, ask questions, vote on budget items
- Budget as whole could not be voted upon
- No parliamentary responsibility despite parliamentary forms
- Representation Structure
Critical Evaluation
- Political Intent
- Aimed to divide nationalists through separate electorates
- Strategy to rally Moderates and Muslims against rising nationalism
- Morley explicitly rejected self-government and parliamentary system
- Structural Flaws
- Introduced parliamentary forms without responsibility
- Election system too indirect (infiltration through sieves)
- Created political barriers between communities
- Contemporary Views`
- Morley: "If reforms led to parliamentary system, I would have nothing to do with it"
- Nehru: Reforms reversed unification process, corrupted political structure
- Montford Report: "Reforms afforded no answer to Indian problems"
- System characterized as benevolent despotism rather than true representation
13. First Phase of Revolutionary Activities (1907 - 1917)
Why the Surge of Revolutionary Activities
- Revolutionary heroism: byproduct of militant nationalism
- Two phases
- Swadeshi/Boycott Movement (until 1917)
- After fallout of Non-Cooperation Movement
- Youth continued revolutionary activities after leadership failure
Revolutionary Programme
- Adopted individual heroic actions following Russian/Irish models
- Methods: assassinations, revolutionary training, fundraising dacoities, military conspiracies
- Goals: terrorize rulers, remove authority fear, inspire patriotic youth
- Extremist leaders failed to counter individualistic violent approach
- Did not distinguish between mass revolution and individual violent acts
A Survey of Revolutionary Activities
Bengal
-
1870s: Inactive secret societies
-
1902: First revolutionary groups formed in Midnapore (Jnanendranath Basu) and Calcutta (Anushilan Samiti by Promotha Mitter)
-
1906: Chapter 12 - 17#^Jugantar-Patrika established
-
1907
- Yugantar group attempted to assassinate Lt. Governor Sir Andrew Fuller
- Attempts to derail Lt. Governor Fraser's train
-
Alipore Conspiracy Case
- 1908: Kingsford bombing killed unintended British women
- British linked bomb to Anushilan members
- Alipore conspiracy case prosecuted Anushilan members
- Aurobindo Ghosh acquitted
- Barindra Ghosh (Head of secret society of revolutionaries) + Ullaskar Dutt (maker of bombs) → given death penalty → later commuted
-
1908: Dacca Anushilan conducted Barrah dacoity for revolutionary funds
-
1909-1910: Assassinations of public prosecutor and deputy superintendent
-
Delhi Conspiracy Trial
- 1912: Rashbehari Bose and Sachin Sanyal attempted to bomb Viceroy Hardinge
- Baswant Kumar Biswas, Amir Chand, Avadh Behari → executed
- Rashbehari Bose → escaped to Japan (1915), later formed INA
-
German Plot / Zimmerman Plan
- WWI: Revolutionaries planned all-India insurrection with German arms
- Bagha Jatin led Bengal, Rashbehari Bose assigned Upper India
- Funded through dacoities, aimed for Fort William seizure and military mutiny
- Plot leaked to police, revolutionaries intercepted at Balasore
- September 1915: Bagha Jatin killed in gunfight, conspiracy collapsed
-
Sandhya, Yugantar (Bengal), Kal (Maharashtra): Revolutionary newspapers #Ind_Publications
-
Legacy: Most substantial outcome of swadeshi Bengal, influenced educated youth
-
Limitations: Hindu religious emphasis alienated Muslims, narrow upper-caste base, quixotic heroism (pursuit of noble but impractical or unrealistic ideals)
Anushilan Samiti
-
1902: Three societies were working to overthrow British
- Pramathanath Mitra (also known as Promotha Mitter) and Satish Chandra Bose
- Sarala Devi
- Prominent Men#Aurobindo Ghose
-
Name derived from Prominent Men#^Anushilan-Tattva by Prominent Men#Bankim Chandra Chatterjee
-
📌 Jugantar Patrika #Ind_Publications
- Wikipedia
- 1906: Founded
- Served as propaganda organ for Anushilan Samiti
- & Advocated violence against police brutalities (Force must be stopped by force)
- Jugantar group: Western wing of the Anushilan Samiti came to known so because of this publication
Punjab
- Extremism driven by famines, high taxes, forced labor (begar)
- Punjabee: Lala Lajpat Rai: Focused on self help #Ind_Publications
- 1907: Government banned political meetings, deported Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh → Punjab Extremism died down
Maharashtra
Revolutionary Activities Abroad
- Indian revolutionaries sought shelter abroad to publish literature immune from Press Acts
- 1905
- Shyamji Krishnavarma
- Established Indian Home Rule Society (India House) in London
- The Indian Sociologist: Shyamji Krishnavarma #Ind_Publications
- Savarkar and Hardayal joined India House
- Shyamji Krishnavarma
- 1909: Madanlal Dhingra assassinated Curzon-Wyllie
"I do not want to say anything in defence of myself, but simply to prove the justice of my deed. As for myself, no English law court has got any authority to arrest and detain me in prison, or pass sentence of death on me. That is the reason I did not have any counsel to defend me. And I maintain that if it is patriotic in an Englishman to fight against the Germans if they were to occupy this country, it is much more justifiable and patriotic in my case to fight against the English. I hold the English people responsible for the murder of 80 millions of Indian people in the last fifty years, and they are also responsible for taking away £100,000,000 every year from India to this country. I also hold them responsible for the hanging and deportation of my patriotic countrymen, who did just the same as the English people here are advising their countrymen to do. And the Englishman who goes out to India and gets, say, £100 a month, that simply means that he passes a sentence of death on a thousand of my poor countrymen, because these thousand people could easily live on this £100, which the Englishman spends mostly on his frivolities and pleasures. Just as the Germans have no right to occupy this country, so the English people have no right to occupy India, and it is perfectly justifiable on our part to kill the Englishman who is polluting our sacred land. I am surprised at the terrible hypocrisy, the farce, and the mockery of the English people. They pose as the champions of oppressed humanity—the peoples of the Congo and the people of Russia—when there is terrible oppression and horrible atrocities committed in India; for example, the killing of two millions of people every year and the outraging of our women. In case this country is occupied by Germans, and the Englishman, not bearing to see the Germans walking with the insolence of conquerors in the streets of London, goes and kills one or two Germans, and that Englishman is held as a patriot by the people of this country, then certainly I am prepared to work for the emancipation of my Motherland. Whatever else I have to say is in the paper before the Court I make this statement, not because I wish to plead for mercy or anything of that kind. I wish that English people should sentence me to death, for in that case the vengeance of my countrymen will be all the more keen. I put forward this statement to show the justice of my cause to the outside world, and especially to our sympathisers in America and Germany."
- Revolutionary centers emerged in Paris, Geneva (Bhikaji Cama), Berlin (Virendranath Chattopadhyaya)
Ghadar Party
- Founding members
- Lots of names on Wikipedia
- President: Sohan Singh Bhakna
- Udham Singh
- Precursor: Swadesh Sevak Home at Vancouver, United India House at Seattle
- 1913: Ghadar Party formed in San Francisco with ex-Punjab soldiers/peasants who migrated to North America
- Ghadar program: assassinate officials, publish revolutionary literature, organize revolts in British colonies
- 1914: Komagata Maru incident (370 immigrants denied entry to Canada) inflamed Punjab situation
- 1915
- February: Planned armed revolt in Punjab garrisons foiled; 45 revolutionaries hanged
- March: Defense of India Act (allowed British to detain without trial, censor press) passed to crush Ghadr movement
Evaluation of Ghadr
- Achievement: preached militant nationalism with secular approach
- Failure: lacked organized leadership, underestimated preparation required
- Lala Hardayal was unsuited as organizer
Revolutionaries in Europe
-
1915: Berlin Committee for Indian Independence established by Virendranath Chattopadhyay, Bhupendranath Dutta, Lala Hardayal
-
Supported by German foreign office under "Zimmerman Plan"
-
Goal: incite rebellion among Indian troops, organize armed invasion
-
Indian revolutionaries sent missions to Baghdad, Paris, Turkey, Kabul
-
Mission to Kabul: organized "provisional Indian government" with crown prince
Mutiny in Singapore
- February 15, 1915: Singapore Mutiny by Punjabi Muslim and Sikh battalions; 37 executed
Decline
- Temporary respite in revolutionary activity after WWI
- Defence of India Rules prisoners released
- Atmosphere of conciliation after Montagu's August 1917 statement
- Talk of constitutional reforms and Gandhi's entry with non-violence program
14. First World War and Nationalist Response
- WWI (1914 - 1919) → Britain, France, Russia, USA, Italy, Japan vs Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey
- Indian responses
- Moderates → Duty to empire
- Extremists/Tilak → Support for promised self-government
- Revolutionaries → Opportunity to fight British
- Revolutionary activities: Ghadar Party (N. America), Chapter 12 - 17#^Berlin-Committee (Europe), soldier mutinies
- War reduced Indian troops to 15,000, created possibility for German/Turkish aid
Home Rule League Movement
- More effective response than revolutionary activities
- Leaders (Tilak, Besant, Khaparde, Iyer, Baptista, Jinnah) formed alliance for continuous action unlike Congress (which only had annual sessions)
- Goal: Self-government within British commonwealth, modelled after Irish Home Rule
- Two separate leagues (Tilak, Besant) launched aggressive political approach
Causative Factors
- Nationalists believed popular pressure needed for government concessions
- Moderates disillusioned with Morley-Minto reforms
- Wartime miseries (high taxation, rising prices) increased protest readiness
- War exposed myth of white superiority (by exposing European vulnerability, colonial soldiers' strength)
- Tilak after June 1914 release made conciliatory gestures, wanted Irish-style reforms not overthrow of the govt
- Annie Besant (in India since 1893) expanded activities to include home rule movement
The Leagues
- 1914: Tilak and Besant revived political activity independently after 1914 Congress session failure to reach Moderate Extremist reconciliation
- 1915: Besant
- Campaigned for self government through newspapers and meetings
- New India, Commonweal: Besant #Ind_Publications
- Separate leagues established b/w Tilak and Besant to avoid friction, coordinated by confining work to specific areas
| Tilak's League | Besant's League | |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment | April 1916 | September 1916 |
| Headquarters | Poona (with first meeting at Belgaum) | Madras |
| Coverage Area | Maharashtra (excluding Bombay city), Karnataka, Central Provinces, and Berar | Rest of India (including Bombay city) |
| Structure | Six branches, more structured organization | 200 branches, loosely organized |
| Key Demands/Personnel | • Swarajya • Formation of linguistic states • Education in the vernacular |
• George Arundale (organizing secretary) • B.W. Wadia and C.P. Ramaswamy Aiyar (key workers) |
Home Rule Programme
- Promoted self-government through education, meetings, propaganda, social work
- 1917 Russian Revolution advantaged campaign
- Attracted prominent leaders including Nehru and Jinnah
- Anglo-Indians, most Muslims and South non-Brahmins avoided movement → felt Home Rule would mean rule of Hindu Majority
Government Response
- Imposed severe repression, especially in Madras where students prohibited from attending political meetings
- 1917
- June: Besant arrested, triggering nationwide protest
- September: Besant released
Movement Decline by 1919
- Organisational weakness, communal riots (1917-18)
- Montagu's 1917 reform statement pacified Moderates
- Montagu-Chelmsford reforms (July 1918) divided nationalists
- September 1918: Tilak abroad for libel case
- Gandhi's approach gained momentum
- 1920: Gandhi renamed league to Swarajya Sabha, by 1921 league joined INC
Home Rule Movement Impact
- Transitioned Congress from deliberative to mass involvement
- Connected towns and countryside, created nationalists
- Prepared masses for Gandhian politics
- Influenced 1917 Montagu-Montford reforms through Tilak and Besant's efforts
1916 Lucknow Session
Readmission of extremists to congress
- Reunited Moderates and Extremists in Congress
- Readmitted Tilak's faction after he declared support for reform, denounced support for overthrow of govt, acts of violence
- Pherozeshah Mehta died → Led the moderate opposition to extremism
1916 Lucknow Pact
- Younger militant nationalists in Muslim League aligned with Congress on anti-imperialism
- Muslim League attitude shifted due to
- Turkey abandonment by Britain
- 1911: Bengal partition annulment
- Refusal of British to set up university at Aligarh
- WWI repression
- Key Provisions of the Pact
- Congress accepted separate electorates until joint electorates demanded
- Muslims received fixed proportion of legislative seats at all levels
- Joint demands
- Self-government declaration
- Expanded elected assemblies at central and provincial levels
- Salaries of Secretary of State for India should be paid by British treasury
- Indian representation in executive councils of Viceroy and provincial governors
Montagu's Statement (August 1917)
- Promised increasing Indian participation in administration
- Gradual development of self-governing institutions
- Made self-government demands non-seditious
- Introduced concept of "dyarchy"
Indian Objections
- No specific timeframe given
- British would decide nature and timing of advances toward responsible government
15. Emergence of Gandhi
- Post-WWI nationalist resurgence in India and colonies
- Gandhi emerged as leader of broad-based struggle against imperialism
Why Nationalist Resurgence Now
- Post-War Economic Crisis: Indian war contributions unacknowledged, taxation funded war, thousands died
- Sectoral Suffering: Industries faced recession, workers unemployed, peasants overtaxed, returning soldiers disillusioned
- Political Expectations: Cooperation during war created expectations of British concessions
- Global Disillusionment: Paris Peace Conference revealed continued imperial ambitions → Instead of granting self determination Britain and France divided the colonies of defeated powers (Germany and Ottoman Empire) among themselves
- Russian Revolution Impact: Bolsheviks renounced imperial rights, demonstrated people's power
Impact of Russian Revolution 1917
- Bolshevik Party overthrew Czarist regime, established Soviet Union under Lenin
- Soviet Union renounced Czarist imperialist rights in Asia
- Granted self-determination to former colonies, equal status to Asian nationalities
- October Revolution demonstrated people's power against tyranny through organization and unity
Consequences
- Militant nationalist movements emerged across Asia/Africa
- Erosion of belief in white superiority
- Charged political atmosphere developed in India
Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919)
- British "carrot and stick" approach: limited reforms with repressive measures
- Carrot → 1919 Reforms: Main Provisions
- Centre: Bicameralism, Responsible govt, Elected with limited franchise (included women)
- Provincial: Dyarchy
- Stick → Rowlatt Act
Limitations
- Franchise extended to only 1.5 million of 260 million population
- Governor/Viceroy retained override powers on all matters
- 75% of budget not votable by legislature
- Critical subjects (finance, police, justice) remained "reserved"
- Ministers lacked control over bureaucrats and finances
Indian Response
- Congress declared reforms "disappointing" and "unsatisfactory"
- Gandhi: "Method of further draining India's wealth"
- Tilak: "A sunless dawn"
- Bose: "Fresh fetters for the people"
- British critics acknowledged reforms preserved imperial control
Making of Gandhi
Early Career and Experiments with Truth in SA
- Born October 2, 1869 in Porbandar, Gujarat; lawyer educated in England
- Witnessed racial discrimination against Indians in South Africa
- Three Indian groups: indentured labourers, merchants, ex-indentured families
- Indians denied voting rights, restricted to unsanitary areas, subject to curfews
Evolution of Resistance Methods
- 1894-1906: Moderate approach using petitions, founded Natal Indian Congress, started paper Indian Opinion
- 1906-1914: Formed Passive Resistance Association, developed satyagraha (passive resistance) against registration certificates requiring Indians to carry fingerprinted identification
- Organized public burning of registration certificates requiring fingerprints
- Protested three-pound poll tax on ex-indentured Indians
- Challenged Supreme Court invalidation of non-Christian marriages
- Founded 1910 by Gandhi and Herman Kallenbach (associate of Gandhi)
- Second settlement after Phoenix Farm in Natal
- Educational experiment combining manual work with intellectual development
- Promoted social service, integrated community, gender equality
- Operated until 1913
Protest against Transvaal Immigration Act
- Indians challenged law restricting movement between South African provinces
- Mass imprisonment of protesters triggered worker strikes across industries
- Gokhale's India tour generated nationwide solidarity movement
- Lord Hardinge's official condemnation forced government to negotiate settlement
- South Africa conceded to major Indian demands on poll tax, registration certificates, marriage recognition
- Promised sympathetic treatment of Indian immigration
Gandhi in South Africa
- Masses showed capacity for sacrifice for meaningful causes
- United Indians across religious, class, gender differences
- Leaders sometimes need unpopular decisions
- Developed unique leadership style on limited scale
Satyagraha Technique
- Truth and non-violence foundation, influenced by Indian tradition, Christianity, Tolstoy
- Core principles: resist wrong, remain truthful, non-violent, fearless
- Methods: non-cooperation, boycott, tax refusal, declining honors
- Requires accepting suffering, maintaining love for opponents
- Demands courage; violence preferable to cowardice
Gandhi in India
- Returned in 1915
- Toured country one year, avoided political positions initially
- Rejected Home Rule agitation during WWI
- Only joined organizations accepting non-violent satyagraha
- 1917-1918: Led three foundational struggles
Champaran Satyagraha (1917)
- & First peasant movement with nationwide attention + First Satyagraha led by Gandhi in India
- First civil disobedience against tinkathia system → peasants forced to grow indigo on
part of total land) → German synthetic dyes replaced indigo → Planters demanded high rents - Gandhi reached to probe → ordered to leave → defied orders, risked punishment
- Secured abolishment of forced cultivation, partial compensation for illegal dues (
) - European planters eventually abandoned region
- Rajendra Prasad: First President, provided legal expertise
- Brajkishore Prasad: Prominent lawyer, offered legal expertise
- JB Kriplani: Teacher at Muzaffarpur College, established connections with local intellectuals
- Mahadev Desai: Gandhi's personal secretary, documented Champaran Satyagraha
Ahmedabad Mill Strike (1918)
- Workers protested plague bonus withdrawal during wartime price doubling
- Demanded 50% wage increase; owners offered 20%
- Gandhi undertook first-ever fast unto death when talks failed
- Resulted in 35% wage increase for workers
Kheda Satyagraha (1918)
- Context and Triggers
- Second satyagraha movement launched 7 days after Chapter 12 - 17#Ahmedabad Mill Strike 1918
- Drought (which led to famine, cholera and plague) reduced yields below 25%, qualifying for tax remission per Revenue Code
- Government refused relief, threatened seizures
- Leadership and Organization
- Initially led by Mohanlal Pandya and Shankarlal Parikh
- Gandhi led tax refusal campaign
- SV Patel organized cross-community resistance
- Women organised Bhajan Mandlis to leverage the participation of women in the agitation
- Farmer's Resistance and Support
- Farmers maintained unity despite property seizures
- Outside Gujaratis provided shelter and support
- Outcome and Significance
- Quid-Pro-Quo agreement: If the well-to-do peasants paid up, the poor would be permitted not to pay, and all the confiscated properties would be returned. (Source: Amritmahotsav)
- Connected economic struggle to independence movement
Gains
- Demonstrated efficacy of satyagraha technique
- Gandhi connected with masses, understood their strengths and weaknesses
- Gained respect and commitment, especially from youth
Rowlatt Act, Satyagraha and Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
Rowlatt Act (March 1919)
-
Background: British feared growing radical nationalist movements (Ghadar Party, Anushilan Samiti etc), Rowlatt Committee (Sedition Committee) recommended continuing emergency wartime measures even after the war
-
Official Name: Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919
-
Extended wartime Defence of India Act as permanent law
-
Provisions
- Allowed detention without trial on mere suspicion of treason
- Secret trials without juries
- Acceptance of evidence not otherwise acceptable under Indian Evidences Act
- Accused were presumed guilty and had to prove innocence (reverse burden of proof)
-
Suspended habeas corpus, imposed press control
-
& All elected Indian legislators (Mohammed Ali Jinnah, Madan Mohan Malaviya, and Mazhar Ul Haq) resigned in protest
Satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act - First Mass Strike
-
Indians expected self-rule rewards for war contributions, felt betrayed
-
Gandhi organized Satyagraha Sabha with Home Rule Leagues and Pan-Islamists
-
April 6, 1919: Launched nationwide hartal with fasting, prayer, civil disobedience
-
Movement significance: directed mass grievances, incorporated peasants/artisans
-
Permanently oriented national movement toward mass participation
-
Violent demonstrations erupted in Calcutta, Bombay, Delhi before launch
-
Punjab situation explosive due to wartime repression, forced recruitment, disease
-
& April 1919: Largest anti-British uprising since 1857 rebellion
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (April 13, 1919)
- Tensions escalated after nationalist leaders arrested without cause (Saifuddin Kitchlew, Dr Satyapal)
- General Dyer banned gatherings during Baisakhi festival
- Jallianwala Bagh → Blocked only exit →Fired 1650 bullets on peaceful crowd without warning killing approx 1,000
- Followed by martial law, public humiliations, forced crawling
- Tagore renounced knighthood, Gandhi surrendered Kaiser-i-Hind (Emperor of India) title and concluded cooperation impossible with satanic regime
- Historians: Decisive moment alienating Indians from British rule
- Transformed Punjab politics, inspired future revolutionaries
The Hunter Committee of Inquiry
- 1919: Hunter Committee formed after Jallianwala Bagh massacre
- Chaired by Lord Hunter with Indian members
- Sir Chimanlal Harilal Setalvad: Bombay University Vice-Chancellor, High Court advocate
- Pandit Jagat Narayan: United Provinces Legislative Council Member, lawyer
- Sardar Sahibzada Sultan Ahmad Khan: Gwalior State lawyer
- Investigated disturbances across Bombay, Delhi, Punjab
- Chaired by Lord Hunter with Indian members
- 1920: Committee unanimously condemned Dyer's actions
- Errors: no warning, excessive firing, authority overstepped
- Indian members emphasized: actions "inhuman," insufficient notices
- Dyer recalled to England with pension, no legal consequences
British Reaction
- Split between condemnation and support
- Churchill: "monstrous," cabinet sought dismissal of Dyer
- House of Lords backed Dyer, public raised £26,000
- Government passed protective Indemnity Act (White Washing Bill for protection of its officers) before inquiry
Congress View
- Congress formed parallel committee with nationalist leaders
- Criticized actions as inhuman, opposed martial law
16. Non Cooperation Movement and Khilafat Aandolan
- Mass movements using non-violent non-cooperation against British
- Cemented Hindu-Muslim unity despite separate origins
Background Factors
- Post-WWI economic crisis → rising prices, taxes, decreased production
- Rowlatt Act, Jallianwalla Bagh massacre → exposed British brutality
- Hunter Committee, British Parliament → endorsed General Dyer
- Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms → failed to satisfy self-government demands
- Lucknow Pact (1916), Rowlatt agitation → united Hindus and Muslims
- Radical nationalist Muslims → gained influence over conservative Aligarh school
The Khilafat Issue
- Turkish sultan (Khalifa) → spiritual leader for Muslims worldwide
- Post-WWI dismemberment of Turkey → angered Muslims globally
- 1919: Khilafat Committee formed → demanded Khalifa's control over sacred places
- Movement evolved → from petitions to boycott of British goods
Congress-Khilafat Alliance
- Gandhi → saw opportunity for united non-cooperation
- Congress supported Khilafat movement to:
- Cement Hindu-Muslim unity
- Incorporate diverse groups into national movement
- Express mass discontent against colonial rule
- Muslim League → gave full support to Congress
The Non Cooperation Khilafat Movement
- 1920:
- February: Failed deputation to viceroy; Gandhi announced would led a movement of non cooperation if terms of peace treaty not favourable to Khalifa
- May: Treaty of Sevres dismembered Turkey
- June: Allahabad conference approved boycott program, asked Gandhi to lead
- August: Khilafat Committee launched non-cooperation
- September: Congress approved non-cooperation program:
- Boycott of
- Government schools, colleges, courts
- Legislative councils
- Foreign cloth, use of khadi
- Renunciation of government honours
- Boycott of
- December: Nagpur session of Congress
- Endorsed non-cooperation
- & Changed goal from self-government to swaraj through peaceful means
- Established Congress Working Committee (CWC)
- Organized provincial committees on linguistic basis
- Reduced entry fee to four annas
- Some moderates (Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Annie Besant, GS Kharpade, BC Pal) wanted constitutional and lawful struggle → left Congress
Spread of the movement
- Educational boycott → Students switched from govt schools to national schools and colleges (800+ established)
- Foreign cloth burning / boycott → imports halved
- & Tilak Swaraj Fund collected ₹1 crore
- Ali brothers arrested for army resignation call
- Civil disobedience began in Bengal (Midnapore) and Andhra (Guntur) as non tax movement against union board taxes
- Strikes in Assam plantations and railways (leader: JM Sengupta)
- Local movements emerged across regions
- UP: Awadh Kisan Movement, Eka Movement
- Malabar: Mappila Revolt
- Sikhs: Agitation for removal of mahants
- Jamia Milia Islamia (1920)
- Founded by Maulana Azad, Zakir Hussain (3rd President), Mahatma Gandhi, others
- Nationalist alternative to British institutions, Aligarh → Delhi (1925), became central university
- Kashi Vidyapeeth (1921)
- British-free education in Varanasi, nationalist and Gandhian focus
- Gujarat Vidyapeeth (1920)
- Founded by Mahatma Gandhi
- Emphasized self-sufficiency, non-violence, rural development
- Bihar Vidyapeeth (1921)
- Founded by Mahatma Gandhi, started by Rajendra Prasad (1st President)
- Promoted indigenous education, supported nationalist movements
People's Response
- Middle Class: Initially led movement, later hesitant; limited elite participation from Calcutta, Bombay, Madras; Rajendra Prasad (Bihar) / Vallabhbhai Patel (Gujarat) provided support
- Business: Supported boycott for swadeshi benefits; big business feared labor unrest
- Peasants: Massive participation despite Congress stance; expressed anti-British / anti Indian (masters and oppressors) sentiments
- Students: Thousands left government schools for national institutions
- Women: Gave up Purdah, donated valuables for Tilak Fund, joined picketing foreign goods
- Hindu-Muslim Unity: Two-thirds of arrestees Muslim; unprecedented communal cooperation
Government Response & Movement End
- May 1921: Gandhi-Reading talks failed over Ali brothers' speeches (Gandhi refused to ask them to remove portion from speeches that suggested violence)
- December: Crackdown on protesters, leaders arrested
- 1922
- Gandhi threatened civil disobedience if political prisoner not released + press control not removed
- February: Chauri Chaura violence (22 policemen killed) → Gandhi withdrew movement
- Leaders (Bose, CR Das, Nehru) criticized withdrawal as premature
- March: Gandhi sentenced to six years imprisonment
Why Gandhi Withdrew the Movement
- People misunderstood non-violence principles
- Chauri-Chaura incident risked movement turning violent
- Colonial regime could easily suppress violent movement and justify armed response
- Movement showed fatigue; government unwilling to negotiate
- November 1922: Khilafat cause dissolved when Turkey became secular under Mustafa Kamal
- 1924: Caliphate abolished completely
Movement Impact Assessment
- Integrated urban Muslims into nationalism while partially communalising politics
- Leaders failed to transform religious consciousness into secular political awareness
- Successfully spread nationalist sentiment nationwide
- Politicised diverse population segments across social classes
17. Emergence of Swarajists, Socialist Ideas, Revolutionary Activities and Other New Forces
Swarajists and No Changers
Genesis of Congress Khilafat Swarajya Party
- 1922
- Post-Gandhi's arrest, nationalists divided on movement strategy
- Swarajists (CR Das, Nehru, Khan) advocated council entry to expose weaknesses, create political arena
- No-Changers (C Rajagopalachari, Patel, Rajendra Prasad, MA Ansari) favoured boycott continuation, constructive work
- Swarajists' proposal defeated at Gaya Congress session
- C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru resigned from Congress leadership
- Formed Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party with Das as president
Key Arguments
- Swarajists: Council entry creates new front, prevents government manipulation, maintains momentum
- No-Changers: Parliamentary work diverts from constructive programs, diminishes revolutionary spirit
Agree to Disagree
- 1923: Compromise allowed Swarajists to contest elections as Congress group to avoid 1907 Surat type split
Swarajist Manifesto (October 1923)
- 1923:
- October: Swarajists released manifesto
- Criticized British selfish interests in governing India
- Denounced reforms as exploitation tools under responsible government pretense
- Promised to present self-government demand in councils
- If demand ejected, would adopt uniform obstruction policy to make governance impossible
- November:
- Swarajists won 42/141 seats, secured Central Provinces majority
- October: Swarajists released manifesto
Gandhi's attitude
- Initially opposed council entry
- 1924
- Feb: Released from prison, gradually reconciled with Swarajists
- Felt public opposition to council entry would be counterproductive
- Government crackdown on revolutionaries and Swarajists angered Gandhi
- Both sides agreed at Congress Session#1924 Belgaum Session session that Swarajists would work in councils as part of Congress
- & Congress Session#1924 Belgaum Session → Gandhi - Swarajists pact
- Swarajists led by Chittaranjan Das and Motilal Nehru wanted to engage in electoral politics
- Unity b/w these 2 factions formalised by this pact
Swarajist Activity in Councils
- Weakened by communal riots, split into Responsivists (pro-government) and Non - Responsivists
- Responsivists (Lala Lajpat Rai, Madan Mohan Malaviya, N.C. Kelkar) advocated government cooperation, office-holding, protecting Hindu interests
- 1925
- Government divided Swarajists by separating militants/moderates, Hindus/Muslims
- Swarajists lost Muslim support over Bengal tenant issues
- 1926
- Leadership advocated civil disobedience, withdrew from legislatures
- 1926 Elections: Swarajists performed poorly, won 40 seats in Central Legislative Assembly
- 1930
- Swarajists walked out following Lahore Congress resolution on Purna Swaraj, beginning Civil Disobedience Movement
Achievements
- Opposed government on budgets
- Advocated self-government
- 1925: Elected Vitthalbhai Patel as speaker
- 1928: Defeated Public Safety Bill (would give govt power to deport undesirable foreigners)
- Exposed Montford scheme limitations
- Demonstrated councils could be used effectively
Drawbacks
- Failed to coordinate legislature/mass struggles
- Relied on newspapers reporting to communicate with public
- Limited coalition-building
- Embraced power privileges
- Neglected peasant causes in Bengal → lost support of Muslims
Constructive Work by No Changers
- Established ashrams among tribes/lower castes, promoted khadi / charkha
- Created national schools
- Worked for Hindu-Muslim unity, untouchability removal, foreign goods boycott
- Led civil disobedience organising
Critique of constructive work
- National education benefited only urban lower-middle classes and rich peasants
- Students attracted to official schools for degrees/jobs rather than ideological commitment
- Khadi promotion hampered by higher costs versus imported cloth
- Untouchability campaigns focused on social aspects while neglecting economic grievances of untouchable landless laborers
Emergency of New Forces: Socialist Ideas, Youth Power, Trade Unionism
- 1920s: Watershed decade—masses joined national movement, political currents crystallised (i.e political ideas became more structured and well defined)
Spread of Marxist and Socialist Ideas
- 1920: CPI formed by M.N. Roy, Abani Mukherji in Tashkent
- Nehru-Bose left wing in Congress combined nationalism with social justice
- 1924: Kanpur Conspiracy Case (British jailed leaders for spreading communist ideas against their rule)
- 1925: CPI formalized
- 1929: Meerut conspiracy arrests (British arrested trade union leaders and communists → accused for planning workers revolt)
Mass Movements
- Youth: Student leagues nationwide
- 1928: Nehru led Bengal Students' Conference
- Peasants: Agitations for tenancy reforms across provinces
- 1928: Bardoli Satyagraha under Patel
Growth of Trade Unionism
- 1920: AITUC (All Indian Trade Union Congress) founded under Lala Lajpat Rai
- 1923: First Indian May Day in Madras
- 1928: Bombay textile strike—150,000 workers for 5 months
Social Reform
- Included
- Chapter 7 - 11#Self-Respect Movement
- Satyashodhak activists in Maharashtra
- Mahars under Ambedkar
Revolutionary Activity with a Turn towards Socialism
- Punjab - UP - Bihar: Hindustan Republic Association (HRA)
- Bengal
- Yungantar
- Anushilan group
- Chittagong Revolt Group
Revolutionary Activity During the 1920s
Why Attraction for Revolutionary Activity after Non Cooperation Movement
- 1920: Revolutionaries released under general amnesty, joined Non-Cooperation Movement
- Movement withdrawal caused disillusionment with non-violence strategy
- Rejected parliamentary Swarajist work and No-Changers' constructive approach
- Revived violent methods as alternative nationalist strategy
Major Influences
- Working class trade unionism after WWI
- 1917: Russian Revolution success inspired revolutionaries
- Communist groups promoting Marxism and socialism
- Revolutionary journals and banned books spread revolutionary ideas
- Atmashakti, Sarathi, Bijoli #Ind_Publications
- Books → Bandi Jiwan (Sachin Sanyal), Pather Dabi (Sharatchandra Chatterjee)
Punjab-UP-Bihar Activity
-
1924: HRA (Hindustan Republic Association / Army) founded in Kanpur (Ramprasad Bismil, Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee, Sachin Sanyal), aimed for Federal Republic with adult franchise
-
1925: Kakori Robbery led to arrests, executions of Bismil, Ashfaqullah, Roshan Singh, Rajendra Lahiri
-
1928
- HRA renamed HSRA (Hindustan Socialist Republican Association) under Azad's leadership, adopted socialism
- Saunders murdered avenging Lala Lajpat Rai
-
1929: Central Legislative Assembly bombing to protest repressive bills (Public Safety Bill, Trade Disputes Bill)
-
23 March, 1931: Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Rajguru hanged, became national heroes (Shaheed Diwas / Sarvodaya Day)
In Bengal
- 1920s: Revolutionary groups reorganised underground activities
- Post-1925: Bengal Congress split after C.R. Das's death into
- Anushilan: JM Sengupta
- Yugantar: Subhash Bose
- 1924: Gopinath Saha executed for assassination attempt, triggered government crackdown
- Factional conflicts initially weakened revolutionary movement
Chittagong Group
- Surya Sen's Chittagong group emerged as most significant revolt group
- 1930: Chittagong Armoury Raid captured weapons, cut communication lines
- 65 activists under Indian Republican Army-Chittagong Branch hoisted national flag, proclaimed revolutionary government
- 1934: Surya Sen's execution inspired continuous revolutionary recruitment
New Phase in Bengal
- Positives
- Women revolutionaries participated extensively in combat and support
- Group action emphasized over individual heroism
- Religious barriers diminished, increased Muslim participation
- Negatives
- Retained conservative elements
- Lacked broader socio-economic vision
- Pritilata Waddedar: Conducted raid, Consumed cyanide after being surrounded by police
- Kalpana Dutt: arrested with Surya Sen, received life sentence
- 1931: Santi Ghosh and Suniti Choudhary killed district magistrate
- 1932: Bina Das fired at governor during her degree convocation
Official Reaction
- Severe government repression with 20 repressive acts
- Villages burned, punitive fines imposed after Chittagong
- 1933: Nehru imprisoned for praising revolutionaries
Ideological Rethinking
- 1925: HRA Manifesto
- Aimed to abolish systems enabling "exploitation of man by man"
- Advocated nationalising industries, creating labor organizations for planned revolution
- Late 1920s
- Revolutionaries shifted from individual violence to mass political movement
- Bismil urged abandoning weapons for open revolutionary work, Hindu-Muslim unity
- Bhagat Singh
- Transitioned from violent action to Marxism
- Revolution must be "by masses, for masses"
- 1926: Established Punjab Naujawan Bharat Sabha for political work among youth, peasants, workers
- Organized Lahore Students' Union (with Sukhdev), recognized revolution required mass movement organization
- Promoted secularism
- Written by → Bhagwati Charan Vohra
- Response to Gandhi's criticism of HSRA's violent methods