18. Simon Commission and the Nehru Report
Appointment of the Indian Statutory Commission
- 1919 Act mandated 10-year review commission; all-white Simon Commission established November 1927
- Conservatives rushed commission before 1929 deadline fearing Labour victory
- British#Lee Commission 1923
- British#Muddiman Committee 1924
- British#Linlithgow Commission 1926
Indian Response
- Unanimous anger over Indian exclusion; viewed as violation of self-determination
- Dec 1927: Congress → boycott commission; Nehru secured independence resolution
- Hindu Mahasabha and Jinnah's Muslim League supported boycott; Shafi faction opposed
- 3 February 1928: Commission arrival met with nationwide hartals, "Simon Go Back" demonstrations
- Youth movement emerged with Nehru and Bose as leaders
Dr Ambedkar's Position
- Appointed by Bombay Council to work with Council
- Argued for universal franchise, provincial autonomy, dyarchy at centre
- On behalf of Bahishkrita Hitakarni Sabha
- Advocated depressed classes as distinct minority needing equal representation to Muslims
- Requested reserved seats or separate electorate; educational and public service safeguards
- Commission granted reserved seats with governor-endorsed candidates; Ambedkar dissatisfied
Police Repression
- Violent suppression of demonstrations; Nehru and Pant beaten
- 1928: Lala Lajpat Rai fatally injured; called blows last nails in coffin of British Imperialism
Impact of Appointment of Simon Commission on the National Movement
- Stimulated radical forces demanding independence and socialist reforms
- Provided Congress mass action opportunity
- Birkenhead's challenge to produce an agreed constitution was accepted, improved unity prospects → Led to Nehru Report (1928)
Simon Commission Recommendations (1930)
- Dyarchy Removal, Provincial autonomy with governor's discretionary powers
- Rejected central parliamentary responsibility, Governor General to appoint cabinet at discretion
- Retained communal electorates
- Delayed federalism via Consultative Council
- NWFP/Baluchistan → Local legislature + Central Representation
- Sindh/Burma separation
- Indian army Indianisation with British forces
Nehru Report (1928)
- & First Indian constitutional framework attempt
- Committee members → Tej Bahadur Sapru, Subhas Chandra Bose, M.S. Aney, Mangal Singh, Ali Imam, Shuaib Qureshi, G.R. Pradhan
- Unanimous report except dominion status vs complete independence
Communal Tensions
- Delhi Proposals (1927): Muslim League demanded
- Joint electorates with Muslim reserved seats
- One-third Muslim representation in Central Assembly
- Proportional representation in Punjab and Bengal
- New Muslim-majority provinces (Sindh, Baluchistan, NWFP)
- Hindu Mahasabha: Opposed Muslim provinces/reservations
- Nehru Report granted concessions to Hindu Mahasabha
- Joint electorates with Muslim reservations only where minority
- Sindh detachment from Bombay with conditions
- Unitary political structure with center holding residual powers
Jinnah's Response
- Amendments (1928): one-third Muslim representation, provincial residual powers
- Fourteen Points (1929)
- Federal constitution with provincial autonomy
- Provincial autonomy
- State concurrence for constitutional amendments
- Muslim representation in all elected bodies
- One-third Muslim representation in central legislature
- One-third Muslim cabinet representation
- Separate electorates
- No legislation against Muslim interests
- No territorial redistribution affecting Muslim majorities
- Sindh separation from Bombay
- Reforms in NWFP and Baluchistan
- Religious freedom
- Protection of Muslim rights
Nehru Report Found Unsatisfactory
- Report rejected by communal groups
- Young Congress leaders (SC Bose, JL Nehru) rejected dominion status for complete independence and jointly set up the Independence for India League
19. Civil Disobedience Movement and Round Table Conferences
- December 1928
- Calcutta Congress session, Nehru Report approved
- Younger elements (Nehru, Bose, Satyamurthy) demanded Purna Swaraj instead of dominion status
- Older leaders (Gandhi, Motilal Nehru) preferred gradual approach to independence
- Congress ultimatum: dominion status by year-end or civil disobedience for complete independence
- 1929:
- Events → Chapter 12 - 17#^Meerut-Conspiracy, Chapter 12 - 17#^Central-Legislative-Assembly-Bombing, Labour Govt in England, Wedgewood Benn became Secretary of India
- Gandhi prepared masses, organized foreign cloth boycott campaign
Irwins Declaration (October 1929)
- Purpose: Restore faith in the ultimate purpose of British Policy
- Promised eventual dominion status, proposed Round Table Conference
Delhi Manifesto (November 1929)
- Delhi Manifesto issued by national leaders with conditions for Rou√nd Table Conference
- Conference should formulate constitution for dominion status implementation
- Congress should have majority representation
- General amnesty for political prisoners
- Irwin rejected Delhi Manifesto demands
Lahore Congress and Purna Swaraj
- December 1929: Lahore Congress under Nehru's presidency
- Declared complete independence goal, authorized civil disobedience
- Decided to boycott Round Table Conference, legislators to resign
- Set January 26, 1930 as Independence Day
- December 31: Tricolor flag hoisted by Nehru at River Ravi
January 26, 1930: The Independence Pledge
- Independence Pledge Read Nationwide
- Declared inalienable right to freedom
- Detailed British exploitation (economic, political, cultural, spiritual)
- Committed to civil disobedience through non-payment of taxes
Civil Disobedience Movement - The Salt Satyagraha and Other Upsurges
Gandhi's Eleven Demands
- 1930: Gandhi issued 11-point ultimatum
- Issues of General Interest: 50% military/civil expenditure reduction, total prohibition, CID reforms, Arms Act changes, political prisoner release, Postal Reservation Bill
- Specific Bourgeois Demands: Rupee-sterling ratio reduction to 1s 4d, textile protection (1 shilling + 4 pence = 16 pence), coastal shipping for Indians
- Specific Peasant Demands: 50% land revenue reduction, salt tax and monopoly abolition
- Congress Working Committee authorized Gandhi to launch movement
Why Salt was Chosen as the Important Theme
- Salt tax affected millions of poor → universal grievance without divisive implications
- Provided symbolic identification opportunity for mass participation
Dandi March (March 12–April 6, 1930)
- Gandhi led 78 followers on 240-mile march from Ahemdabad → violated salt law at Dandi
- Directives: salt law disobedience, foreign shop picketing, tax refusal, lawyer practice suspension, court boycotts
Spread of Salt Law Disobedience
- 1930:
- April: Nehru's arrest → demonstrations in Madras, Calcutta, Karachi
- May: Gandhi's arrest → after his announcement of raid on Dharasana Salt Works
- After Gandhi's arrest → CWC sanctioned
- Ryotwari areas → Non payment of revenue
- Zamindari areas → No chowkidara tax (Tax charged on farmers etc to pay village watchmen)
- Central provinces → Violation of forest laws
Satyagraha at Different Places
| Region | Leader(s) | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Tamil Nadu | C. Rajagopalachari | |
| • Rajagopalachari organized salt march from Tiruchirappalli to Vedaranniyam (April 1930)
• Foreign cloth picketing in Coimbatore, Madura, Virudhunagar |
| Malabar | • K. Kelappan
• P. Krishna Pillai | • Kelappan organized Vaikom Satyagraha
• Krishna Pillai defended national flag against police lathi-charge at Calicut beach (November 1930) |
| Andhra Region | Local district leaders | • Salt marches in east/west Godavari, Krishna, Guntur
• Shibirams (military-style camps) as movement headquarters
• Merchant financial support |
| Orissa | Gopalbandhu Choudhury | • Choudhury led effective salt satyagraha in coastal regions of Balasore, Cuttack, Puri |
| Assam | Student leaders | • Limited civil disobedience due to Assamese/Bengali and Hindu/Muslim divisions
• Successful student strike against Cunningham Circular (May 1930) |
| Bengal | • SC Bose
• JM Sengupta | • Largest number of arrests despite Congress divisions
• Strong movements around salt satyagraha and chaukidari tax resistance
• Movement persisted despite communal riots
• Chapter 12 - 17#Chittagong Group activities under Surya Sen |
| Bihar | Local district organizers | • Champaran and Saran first districts to start salt satyagraha
• Powerful no-chaukidari tax agitation replaced salt movement due to geographical constraints
|
| Hazaribagh (Chhotanagpur) | • Bonga Majhi
• Somra Majhi | • Lower-class tribal militancy
• Movement combining socio-religious reform with sanskritising elements (give up meat, liquor, use khadi)
• Gandhian influence adapted to tribal context |
| Peshawar | Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan / Badshah Khan / Frontier Gandhi | • Khan started Pukhtoon #Ind_Publications and his Khudai Khidmatgars (Red Shirts) led protests
• April 23 arrests of Congress leaders triggered mass demonstrations
• City under crowd control for a week |
| Sholapur | Textile worker leaders | • Textile workers struck May 7-16 after Gandhi's arrest
• Burning of government symbols
• Establishment of parallel government requiring martial law |
| Dharasana, Gujarat | • Sarojini Naidu
• Imam Sahib
• Manilal (Gandhi's son) | • May 21, 1930 Dharasana Salt Works raid led by Naidu, Imam Sahib, and Manilal Gandhi
• Faced brutal lathi-charge resulting in 2 deaths, 320 injuries |
| Gujarat | Local district leaders | • Determined no-revenue campaign in Anand, Borsad, Nadiad (Kheda), Bardoli (Surat), Jambusar (Bharuch)
• Villagers fled to princely states to avoid repression |
| Maharashtra, Karnataka, Central Provinces | Forest community leaders | • Forest law defiance including grazing/timber restrictions
• Illegal forest produce sales |
| United Provinces | Zamindari and tenant leaders | • No-revenue campaign targeting zamindars and tenants
• Activity accelerated October 1930 in Agra and Rai Bareilly |
| Manipur and Nagaland | 📌 Rani Gaidinliu | • 13-year-old Rani Gaidinliu raised banner of revolt against British rule
• Urged people not to pay taxes |
Impact of Agitation
- Foreign imports fell, government lost revenue from various sources
- Legislative Assembly elections boycotted
Extent of Mass Participation
- Women formed picket lines at liquor shops, foreign cloth shops
- Students and youth led boycott efforts
- Muslim participation limited compared to 1920-22 movement
- Various groups participated: merchants, tribals, workers, peasants
- Regional participation varied with strong showing in certain areas
Government Response - Efforts for Truce
- Government faced dilemma: repression vs. inaction (Congress claimed repression vs victory)
- Civil liberties restricted, Congress Working Committee banned
- Violence against protesters, thousands imprisoned
- 1930
- July: Viceroy proposed round table conference
- August: Nehrus met Gandhi in jail
- Talks failed over demands
- Right of secession from Britain
- Complete national government control over defense and finance
- Independent tribunal for Britain's financial claims
Gandhi-Irwin Pact
- 1931:
- January: Congress leaders released unconditionally
- March: Delhi Pact / Gandhi Irwin Pact signed with specific terms
- Government agreed to
-
Political concessions
-
Release all political prisoners not convicted of violence
-
Remission of uncollected fines
-
Lenient treatment to resigned government servants
-
Withdrawal of emergency ordinances
-
-
Land and property rights
- Return lands not sold to third parties
- Salt making rights in coastal villages
-
Civil liberties
- Peaceful picketing rights
-
- Viceroy turned down
-
Public inquiry into police excesses
-
Commutation of Bhagat Singh and comrades' death sentences
-
- Gandhi agreed to
- Suspend civil disobedience
- Participate in next Round Table Conference
Evaluation of Civil Disobedience Movement
- Not a retreat: mass movements naturally short-lived, exhaustion evident
- Youth disappointed after enthusiastic participation
- Peasants of Gujarat disappointed as lands not restored immediately
- Political prisoners given hero's welcome upon release
Comparison to Non-Cooperation Movement
- Movement Characteristics
- Stated objective was complete independence not vaguely worded swaraj
- Methods involved law violation from beginning
- Congress organizationally stronger
- Participation Patterns
- Decline in intelligentsia protests
- Muslim participation nowhere near Non-Cooperation level
- No major labour upsurge
- Massive peasant and business participation compensated for other features
- Impact Metrics
- Imprisonment numbers tripled
Karachi Congress Session - 1931
- Disapproved political violence while admiring martyrs' "bravery" and "sacrifice"
- Endorsed Delhi Pact (Gandhi-Irwin Pact) → Black flag protests greeted Gandhi over failure to secure commutation of death sentences
- Reiterated Purna Swaraj goal
- Adopted two key resolutions on Fundamental Rights and National Economic Programme
- Fundamental Rights Resolution
- Free speech/press
- Form associations
- Universal franchise
- Equal rights irrespective of caste, creed sex
- Religious neutrality
- Compulsory primary education
- Minority protections
- National Economic Programme
- Economic reforms for rural areas
- Substantial rent and revenue reduction for landholders and peasants
- Exemption from rent for uneconomic holdings
- Relief from agricultural indebtedness
- Abolition of usury (lending money at unreasonably high interest rates)
- Labor reforms
- Better work conditions including living wage, limited hours, protection for women workers
- Right for workers and peasants to form unions
- Industrial policy
- State ownership of key industries, mines, transport
- Economic reforms for rural areas
The Round Table Conferences
| Conference | Date | Major Participants | Women Participants | Political Context | Key Events | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Round Table Conference | November 1930 - January 1931 | • Maharajas of Alwar, Baroda, Bhopal, etc. • Muslim League (Aga Khan III, Jinnah • Hindu Mahasabha • Sikhs • Liberals (Tej Bahadur Sapru) • Depressed Classes (B.R. Ambedkar) • Justice Party, Anglo-Indians, Europeans, universities representatives |
• Begum Jahanara Shahnawaz • Radhabai Subbarayan |
• First conference between British and Indians as equals • Congress refused to attend |
• General agreement on India developing into a federation • Safeguards for defense and finance discussed • Debates on minority representation |
• Little achieved • British realized Congress participation necessary • Civil disobedience continued in India |
| Second Round Table Conference | September 7 - December 1, 1931 | • Gandhi (sole Congress representative) • Princely states representatives • Muslims, Hindu groups, Liberals, Justice Party • Depressed Classes, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Labour |
• Sarojini Naidu • Begum Jahanara Shahnawaz • Radhabai Subbarayan |
• Followed [[#Gandhi-Irwin Pact]] • Lord Willington replaced Irwin as Viceroy • Labour government in England replaced by Conservative-dominated coalition |
• Gandhi claimed to represent all Indians • Disagreements over minority representation • Session deadlocked on Minorities' Pact • Gandhi demanded partnership based on equality |
• No substantial results due to disagreements • MacDonald announced two Muslim majority provinces (NWFP, Sindh) • Indian Consultative Committee and expert committees formed • Prospect of unilateral British-Communal Award |
| Third Round Table Conference | November 17 - December 24, 1932 | • Princely states representatives • Aga Khan III • B.R. Ambedkar • M.R. Jayakar • Tej Bahadur Sapru • Boycotted by Indian National Congress and Gandhi |
• Begum Jahanara Shahnawaz | • Followed failure of second conference • Conservative government in Britain opposed negotiating with Congress on equal basis |
• Like previous conferences, little was achieved | • Recommendations published in White Paper (March 1933) • Debated in British Parliament • Joint Select Committee formed • Draft Bill produced (February 1935) • Government of India Act of 1935 enforced from July 1935 |
Civil Disobedience Resumed
- 1931: Congress Working Committee resumed civil disobedience after Round Table Conference failure
During Truce Period (March-December 1931)
- United Provinces: Congress led rent reduction movement
- NWFP: Repression against Khudai Khidmatgars and peasants led by them against brutal methods of tax collection
- Bengal: Mass detentions
- September 1931: Hijli Jail firing incident
Changed Govt Attitude After Second RTC
- Prevent Gandhi building mass movement tempo
- Maintain confidence of government functionaries, loyalists
- Block rural consolidation of national movement
- 31 Dec 1931: Viceroy Willingdon refused a meeting with Gandhi
- 4 Jan 1932: Gandhi arrested
Government Action
- "Civil Martial Law" imposed via repressive ordinances
- Congress banned, activists arrested, properties confiscated
- Women targeted, press gagged, literature banned
Popular Response
- 80,000 Satyagrahis jailed in first four months
- Protests: picketing, gatherings, demonstrations, tax resistance
- Movement failed: leaders arrested, masses unprepared
- 1934: Gandhi withdrew movement despite maintaining political faith
Communal Award and Poona Pact
- 16 August, 1932: Ramsay MacDonald announced Communal Award (based on findings of Lothian Committee)
- Provisions of communal award
- Electoral provisions
- Separate electorates for Muslims, Europeans, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, depressed classes, Marathas lasting 20 years
- Provincial legislature seats distributed on communal basis
- Existing provincial legislature seats doubled
- Muslims in minority areas granted weightage
- Depressed classes accorded minority status
- Depressed classes given "double vote" (separate and general electorates)
- Special representation allocations
- 3% seats reserved for women in all provinces except NWFP
- Specific seat allocations for labourers, landlords, traders, industrialists
- Bombay province: 7 seats allocated for Marathas
- Electoral provisions
Congress Stand
- Opposed separate electorates but wouldn't change Award without minorities' consent
- Neither accepted nor rejected the Award
Gandhi's Response
- Viewed Award as attack on Indian unity and nationalism
- Argued separate political entity for depressed classes undermined abolishing untouchability
- Claimed separate electorates would perpetuate untouchability
- Demanded depressed classes be elected through joint electorates
- 20 September, 1932: Started indefinite fast
- Ambedkar, MC Rajah, and Madan Mohan Malaviya negotiated compromise in Poona Pact
Poona Pact
- 24 September, 1932
- Agreement signed abandoning separate electorates for depressed classes
- Signed by total of 23 people
- Prominent Men#BR Ambedkar
- Madan Mohan Malaviya
- & Gandhi did not sign the pact, his son Devdas Gandhi did
- Reserved seats increased: 71 → 147 provincial, 18% Central Legislature
- Government accepted above Communal Award amendment
Impact on Dalits
- Limitations of political representation for depressed classes
- Failed emancipation despite political rights, preserved Hindu social order
- Depressed classes became political tools of caste Hindu organizations
- Representatives ineffective against Hindu-chosen stooges
- Prevented independent leadership development
- Long-term consequences
- Subordinated Dalits into Hindu social structure
- Blocked equality-based society
- Pre-empted constitutional safeguards in independent India
Joint Electorates Impact
- All India Scheduled Caste Federation alleged → 1935 joint electorates prevented true representation
- Hindu majority could nominate compliant scheduled caste members
- Federation demanded separate electorates until 1947
Gandhi's Harijan Campaign and thoughts on Caste
Gandhi's Harijan Campaign
- September 1932: Established All India Anti-Untouchability League
- January 1933: Started weekly Harijan newspaper
- August 1933: Launched campaign against untouchability from jail
- Nov 1933 - July 1934: Conducted nationwide Harijan tour covering 20,000 km after release → Collected funds for Harijan Sevak Sangh
- Faced orthodox opposition; government defeated Temple Entry Bill (1934) (would've allowed Dalits temple entry)
- Combined social reform with nationalist messaging to Harijan labourers
Gandhi's caste philosophy
- Condemned untouchability while preserving varnashram system
- "Hinduism dies if untouchability lives"
- Differed from Ambedkar's call for complete caste annihilation
- Advocated temple entry, penance by caste Hindus
- Preferred persuasion over compulsion
- Envisioned complementary rather than hierarchical caste relations
- Included Harijan self-improvement (education, hygiene, dietary reform)
Dr Ambedkar vs Gandhi
Difference in approach
| Aspect | Ambedkar's Approach | Gandhi's Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Core Philosophy | • Political and legal means for empowerment • Emphasis on dismantling the caste system |
• Social and spiritual transformation • Reform of the caste system rather than abolition |
| Main Methods | • Constitutional safeguards • Legal rights • Political representation • Education and economic empowerment |
• Fasts • Prayers • Appeals to upper-caste conscience • Village-based self-sufficiency |
| View on Caste | • Root cause of oppression • Needed to be annihilated |
• Social evil to be reformed • Not inherently oppressive if practiced without hierarchy • Aimed to eradicate untouchability |
| Electoral Approach | • Initially advocated for separate electorates • Agreed to reserved seats in joint electorates (Poona Pact) |
• Strongly opposed separate electorates • Favored joint electorates |
| Economic Vision | • Industrialization and urbanization • Land reforms • Breaking caste-based occupations |
• Village-based economy • Self-sufficiency • Traditional occupations |
| Religious Stance | • Critiqued Hindu scriptures • Advocated conversion (to Buddhism) as emancipation |
• Sought to reform Hinduism from within • Against religious conversion |
| Mass Mobilisation | • Organized political parties and labor unions • Focused on Dalit and working-class issues |
• Led national movements • Broader focus on independence and social reform |
| Legacy | • Continues to influence modern Dalit movements • Basis for ongoing demands for political and economic rights |
• Influenced social reform movements • Less direct impact on Dalit political mobilization |
| Education | • Modern, secular education as a liberating force • Established educational institutions for Dalits |
• Valued education • Less emphasis on modern education |
Common aspects in approach
- Social Justice & Equality
- Combating Dalit inequalities
- Ambedkar: Legal reforms
- Gandhi: Social transformation
- Eradication of untouchability
- Different approaches, shared goal
- Combating Dalit inequalities
- Education as Empowerment
- Advocacy for reforms
- Inclusive: Caste, gender, class-agnostic
- Non-violent Methods
- Peaceful approaches
- Negotiation-based strategies
20. Debates on the Future Strategy after Civil Disobedience Movement
- Two-stage debate
- 1934 - 1935: Immediate strategy
- 1937: Office acceptance question in provincial elections under GOI Act 1935
- First stage presented three perspectives: Gandhian constructive work, constitutional participation, leftist mass struggle
The First Stage Debate
- Perspective 1: Constructive work on Gandhian lines
- Perspective 2: Constitutional struggle advocates argued elections maintain political interest without implying faith in constitutional politics
- Perspective 3: Nehru-led leftists rejected both approaches, favored continued mass struggle against colonialism
Nehru's Vision
- Goal: replace capitalism with socialism
- Viewed movement withdrawal as ideological surrender
- Advocated class-based organizations (kisan sabhas and trade unions) affiliated with Congress
- Insisted anti-imperialism required class struggle integration
Nehru's Opposition to Struggle-Truce-Struggle Strategy
- Gandhi supporters favoured alternating struggle and recovery phases (S-T-S)
- Nehru advocated continuous confrontation through direct action
- Proposed Struggle-Victory (S-V) strategy without constitutional compromise
Finally, Yes to Council Entry
- Gandhi reconciled opposition by ensuring constructive work continued alongside parliamentary politics
- 1934: Congress established Parliamentary Board, won 44/75 Indian seats
- Internal tensions remained between Gandhi and various sections
- Section favouring parliamentary politics
- Section against Gandhi's emphasis on spinning wheel as second lung of the nation
- Section of socialists led by Nehru
- 1934: Gandhi announced resignation from Congress
GOI Act 1935
- Different Acts by the British#Government of India Act 1935#Administration
- Different Acts by the British#Government of India Act 1935#Central Legislature
- Different Acts by the British#Government of India Act 1935#Provincial Legislature
Evaluation
- Governor general's safeguards + special responsibilities hindered proper functioning
- Governor retained extensive powers
- Limited franchise (14% population)
- Communal electorates fostered separatism leading to partition
- Rigid constitution with amendment rights reserved for British Parliament
Long-Term British Strategy
- Short term: Suppress movement
- Long term: Weaken national movement, integrate large segment of movement into colonial, constitutional and administrative structure
- Reforms to revive political standing of constitutional liberals who lost support during Civil Disobedience
- Aimed to convince Congressmen of ineffectiveness of extra-legal struggle
- Create dissensions within Congress: placate right wing, crush radical leftists
- Provincial autonomy would create powerful provincial leaders, weakening central leadership
Nationalists' Response
- 1935 Act rejected by Congress, supported by Hindu Mahasabha and National Liberal Foundation
- Congress demanded adult franchise-based Constituent Assembly
The Second Stage Debate
- 1937: Provincial elections announced
- Strategy debate resumed → 1935 Act was to be opposed but unclear since mass movement not possible
- Ideological divisions emerged on post-election approach
Divided Opinion
- Opposed to office acceptance
- Nehru-Bose-leftists opposed office acceptance
- Arguments: Negated rejection of act, Assumed responsibility without power, Diminished revolutionary character
- Leftist counter-strategy: Enter councils to create deadlocks, make act unworkable
- Long-term strategy: Increased reliance on workers/peasants, integrating class organizations
- Favour of office acceptance
- Participation as strategy to combat act from within, prevent reactionary control
- Viewed legislative work as socialist strategy, not abandonment of mass movement
Gandhi's Position
- Initially opposed office acceptance at CWC meeting
- By 1936, willing to give trial to Congress ministries
- Sessions at Lucknow (1936) and Faizpur (1937) decided to fight elections
- Congress resolution: Not submit to constitution but combat it inside and outside legislatures
Congress Manifesto
- Political Declarations
- Reaffirmed total rejection of the 1935 Act
- Promised release of prisoners
- Social Justice Commitments
- Removal of disabilities on the basis of gender and caste
- Right to form trade unions and to strike
- Economic Reforms
- Promised radical transformation of the agrarian system
- Substantial reduction of rent and revenue
- Scaling down of rural debts
- Cheap credit
- Gandhi abstained from election meetings
Elections and Congress Performance
- February 1937: 30.1 million voters participated
- Congress won 716/1,161 seats, majority in most provinces
- Nationalist strategy vindicated, prestige increased
21. Congress Rule in Provinces
- Congress ministries formed in Bombay, Madras, Central Provinces, Orissa, UP, Bihar, NWFP, Assam
Gandhi's advice
- Hold offices lights, to be seen as crown of thorns
- Prove Congress could rule with minimal police/army
Work under Congress Ministries
- Ministries increased Congress prestige but couldn't change imperial system fundamentals
Civil Liberties
- Post-Emergency Reforms
- Repealed emergency powers laws
- Lifted ban on organizations (Hindustan Seva Dal, Youth Leagues)
- Removed press restrictions, newspapers from blacklists
- Restored confiscated arms/licenses, curbed police powers, stopped shadowing politicians
- Released political prisoners, revoked deportation/internment orders
- Civil Disobedience Movement Reparations
- Restored lands confiscated during Civil Disobedience Movement
- Restored pensions of officials associated with Civil Disobedience Movement
- Contradictions and Exceptions
- Yusuf Meherally and S.S. Batliwala arrested (both socialist, gave seditious / inflammatory speeches)
- K.M. Munshi used CID against communists/leftists
Agrarian Reforms
- Agrarian reforms were constrained due to
- Political and Administrative Constraints
- Inadequate ministerial powers
- Confrontational politics (over cooperation) with colonialism
- Reactionary Legislative Council (dominated by landlords, moneylenders etc) required conciliation
- Economic and Resource Constraints
- Insufficient financial powers → major portion of budget appropriated by GOI
- Complex agrarian structure
- Social and Strategic Constraints
- Need to neutralize zamindars through class adjustments
- Temporal Constraints
- 1938: WWII war clouds
- Political and Administrative Constraints
- Despite constraints, legislated laws on land reforms, debt relief, grazing fees, rent arrears
- Main beneficiaries: Statutory / occupancy tenants
Labour Reforms
- Promoted arbitration over strikes
- Improved conditions while controlling militant unions
Social welfare
- Harijan welfare initiatives
- Harijan welfare measures (temple entry, public facilities access, scholarships)
- Increased Harijans in government services and police
- Education and public health
- Focus on primary/technical/higher education and public health/sanitation
- Economic development
- Khadi promotion through subsidies
- Indigenous enterprise encouragement
- 1938: Planning development through National Planning Committee under Subhas Chandra Bose
- Administrative reforms
- Prison reforms
Extra Parliamentary Activity
- Mass literacy campaigns
- Congress police stations and panchayats
- Congress Grievance Committees presenting petitions
- States peoples' movements
Evaluation
- Positive Outcomes
- Congress rule
- Confirmed self-government necessity
- Demonstrated state power use
- Controlled riots
- Weakened bureaucracy
- Neutralised opposition
- Previewed independence
- Administrative success disproved Indians-can't-rule myth
- Provided independence preview
- Congress rule
- Congress Shortcomings
- 1939: Power struggles emerged, resigned after WWII outbreak
- Shifted toward capitalists, away from labor
- 1938: Passed anti-labor Bombay Traders Disputes Act
- Failed to resolve Praja Mandal dilemma
- Struggled meeting governance expectations
- All India Muslim League Response
- Annoyed with Congress for not sharing power
- 1938: Pirpur Committee documented alleged Congress atrocities
- Charged religious interference, Urdu suppression, Hindu favouritism
- Claimed Muslim marginalisation in representation and economy
22. Nationalist Response in the Wake of World War II
Congress Crisis on Method of Struggle
- Post-civil disobedience: Gandhi concerned with corruption, indiscipline, rivalries
- Gandhi's views
- Congress needed internal reform before resuming movement
- Masses not ready for struggle; others disagreed
Haripura and Tripuri Sessions: Subhash Bose's Views
- Bose Ideologies
- Bose: Bengal Provincial Congress leader focused on youth, trade unions
- Opposed dominion status, demanded full independence
- Rejected Gandhi-Irwin Pact, protested Bhagat Singh's death sentence
- 1938: Elected president at Haripura
- Advocated economic development through planning, set up National Planning Committee later
- Supported agitation against princely states
- 1939: Congress Internal Strife
- Bose again won presidency against Gandhi's candidate
- Gandhi: "Pattabhi's defeat is my defeat"
- Ideological polarization intensified within Congress
- Working committee resigned after Bose's accusations (accused of being ready to reach a compromise with govt on matters of federation)
- Tripuri Confrontation - 1939
- March: Bose called for six-month ultimatum to British
- Bose: Congress strong, masses ready, international crisis (WWII) favorable
- Gandhi: opposed ultimatum, cited unreadiness, communal discord, class strife
- Fundamental ideological divide: immediate radical action (Bose) vs. preparation (Gandhi)
- Resolution passed supporting Gandhian approach
- April: Bose resigned, Rajendra Prasad elected president
- May: Bose formed Forward Bloc within Congress
- August: Bose removed from leadership of Bengal Provincial Congress Committee, barred from office
Gandhi and Bose
Differences
| Aspect | Mahatma Gandhi | Subhas Chandra Bose |
|---|---|---|
| Approach to Independence | • Advocated ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha • Believed non-violence was the only moral path |
• Supported militant resistance • Believed armed struggle necessary to defeat British rule • Saw civil disobedience alone as insufficient |
| Means and Ends | • Means must be as pure as ends • Truth guides all actions • Deeply opposed Fascist/Nazi ideologies |
• Results-focused, pragmatic approach • Tactically allied with Axis powers • Association with Germany/Japan was strategic, not ideological |
| Vision of Government | • Advocated stateless society • Supported self-sufficient village republics • Feared state power would destroy individuality |
• Initially democratic, later more authoritarian • Favored transition to socialism • Formed Provisional Government of Azad Hind (1944) |
| Views on Militarism | • Opposed all militarism • Believed perfect society needs no armies • Permitted minimal self-defense when attacked |
• Embraced military discipline • Formed ceremonial guards • Established Indian National Army (INA) |
| Economic Philosophy | • Supported decentralized village economy (village Sarvodaya) • Opposed industrialisation • Theory of trusteeship: Advocated wealth sharing through trusteeship |
• Favored state-controlled industrial development • Soviet-inspired economic model • Supported mix of heavy, medium and cottage industries |
| Religious Views | • Deeply religious • Believed all faiths lead to same truth • Considered service to poor highest form of worship |
• Secularist • Believed in Upanishadic teachings, revered the Bhagavad Gita • Viewed religion as private matter separate from state • Maintained religiously equal army (INA) |
| Stance on Caste | • 3 goals • Eradicate untouchability • Maintain varna distinctions of caste system • Strengthen tolerance, modesty and religiosity |
• Completely rejected caste system • Advocated inter-caste marriage • Both opposed untouchability as barrier to national unity |
| Women's Issues | • Patriarchal view of women as homemakers • Emphasized Sita-like virtues • Focused on moral reform without challenging fundamental gender roles |
• Viewed women as equals in public affairs • Promoted combat roles through Rani of Jhansi Regiment under Prominent Women#Lakshmi Swaminathan • Created institutional structures for women's leadership |
| Education | • Advocated Nai Talim / Basic education for village self-sufficiency • Emphasized handicrafts and moral development • Education for spiritual growth with Hindu scriptures |
• Promoted technical/scientific higher education • Encouraged foreign training for industrialization • Education focused on national reconstruction and industrial advancement |
Similarities
- Mutual Respect
- Gandhi called Bose "Prince among the Patriots"
- Bose recognized Gandhi as "Father of Nation"
- Anti-Imperialism
- Dedicated to complete independence from British colonial rule
- Willing to endure personal hardship for independence cause
- National Unity
- Worked to unite Indians across religious and regional divides
- Supported religious tolerance and opposed communalism
- Social Reform
- Strongly condemned untouchability as barrier to progress
- Advocated for women's participation in freedom struggle
- Believed women should have elevated status in society
- Opposed traditional constraints limiting women's potential
- Economic Vision
- Believed some form of socialism necessary for India's future
- Opposed exploitation and advocated equitable distribution
- Educational Reform
- Recognized importance of education reform for national development
- Wanted Indian education system distinct from British colonial model
- Emphasized practical skills alongside theoretical knowledge
- Ideological Boundaries
- Rejected racial superiority theories despite Bose's tactical alliances
- Disliked communism as political system for India
- Combined the good aspects of
- Socialism: Justice, Equality, Love
- Fascism: Efficiency and Discipline
- Written in Hind Swaraj
- Utopia that did not need a representative, a constitution, an army or a police force
- Built on the concept of truth, non violence and self regulation
- Capitalism, communism, exploitation and religious violence would be absent
Second World War and Nationalistic Response
- 1939: Germany attacked Poland September 1, Britain declared war September 3
- British India declared support without Indian consultation
Congress Offer to Viceroy
- Conditional war support with two requirements
- Post-war constituent assembly
- Immediate responsible government
- Linlithgow rejected offer despite Congress argument conditions needed for public support
CWC Meeting at Wardha
- Gandhi: Supported Allies due to stronger anti-fascist stance despite disliking imperialism
- Socialists (Bose, Dev, Narayan): Opposed participation, viewed war as imperialist conflict, considered ideal time to launch civil disobedience movement
- Nehru: Recognized democracy-fascism distinction but demanded Indian freedom first
- CWC Resolution: Condemned fascist aggression, stated India couldn't join war without
- Democratic freedom in India
- Britain proving commitment to democracy by ending imperialism
- Government declaring war aims regarding democracy after war
Government Attitude and Congress Ministries' Resignation
- Linlithgow's negative response (October 17) leveraged Muslim League + Princes against Congress
- Government refused to define war aims, proposed consultative committee only
Government's Hidden Agenda
- British policy used war to regain control, implemented emergency powers
- Defence ordinance restricted civil liberties; May 1940 draft prepared for pre-emptive strikes
- Aimed to win liberal and leftist sympathy by showing Congress as pro Japan and Germany
- Churchill supported reactionary policies, branded Congress as Hindu organization
Congress Ministries Decide to Resign
- CWC (October 23) rejected rejected viceregal statement as imperialist policy
- CWC decided not to support war and called for Congress ministries to resign in provinces
Debate on the Question of Immediate Mass Satyagraha
- Gandhi opposed immediate struggle due to just allied cause, communal sensitivities and organisational weakness
- Advocated political work before launching struggle
- 1940: Linlithgow → Goal of British policy in India is Dominion status after war
November 1939 CWC Resolution
- Declared war fought for imperialist ends like WWI
- Demanded independence and constituent assembly
The Ramgarh Session (March 1940)
- Internal disagreement between Gandhi's cooperation and Nehru/Bose's militancy
- Congress demanded complete independence, not dominion status
- Civil disobedience would begin when organization ready
Pakistan Resolution—Lahore (March 1940)
- Muslim League called for independent Muslim-majority states
August Offer (1940)
August Offer - Proposals
- Proposed by: Viceroy Linlithgow
- Expansion of viceroy executive council with more Indians / Indian majority executive council
- Establishment of advisory war council
- Post-war constituent assembly
- Indians would decide the constitution according to their social, political, economic conceptions (subject to defence, minority rights treaties etc)
- No constitution without minorities consent
- Dominion Status: Ultimate objective for India
Evaluation
- & First recognition of Indians' right to frame constitution
- Congress demand for constituent assembly conceded
- July 1941: Viceroy's executive council expanded with Indian majority (8 of 12)
August Offer - Reason for Rejection
- Congress leaders rejected dominion status
- & Dominion status concept is dead as a doornail ~ Prominent Men#JL Nehru
- Muslim League welcomed veto assurance but reiterated demand for partition
Individual Satyagraha
- Gandhi initiated limited civil disobedience against war participation
- 🎯
- Show nationalist patience not weakness
- Express disinterest in war
- Give government opportunity to accept demands
- 25,000 convicted by May 1941, evolved into "Delhi Chalo Movement"
Gandhi-Nehru Relationship
- December 1941: Congress leaders released after Japan's attack
- CWC overruled Gandhi/Nehru objections, passed resolution to cooperate in defense if
- Full independence after war
- Immediate transfer of substantial power
- Gandhi designated Nehru as successor despite differences
- Temperament: Nehru secular, Gandhi religious
- Development: Nehru favoured industrialisation, Gandhi rural revival
- State power: Nehru believed in modern state, Gandhi in individual conscience
- Gandhi chose Nehru because he reflected pluralist, inclusive idea of India
- Nehru was Hindu trusted by Muslims, northerner respected in south, admired by women
Cripps Mission
- March 1942: Stafford Cripps sent to India with constitutional proposals seeking war support
- Cripps: left-wing Labourite, supported Indian national movement
Why Mission Sent
- Japanese threat to India made Indian support crucial
- Allied pressure (USA, USSR, China) for Indian cooperation
- Nationalists demanded immediate power transfer and post-war independence
Main Proposals of Cripps Mission
- Indian Union: Dominion status, freedom to determine international relations
- Post war Constituent assembly: Partly elected (from provincial assemblies through proportional representation), partly prince-nominated members to frame constitution
- Conditions for British acceptance of newly framed constitution
- & Provinces could opt out & form separate union / constitution
- Treaty required for power transfer b/w new constituent assembly and British
- Defence temporarily remains under British control + Governor General's power would remain intact
Departures from Past and Implications
-
Provincial separation option → blueprint for partition
-
Attempt to Resolve Impasse
- Constitution-making fully Indian-controlled (not "mainly" as in August Offer)
- Concrete assembly plan established
- Commonwealth withdrawal permitted
- Increased interim Indian administration
Why Cripps Mission Failed
- Congress rejected
- Dominion status instead of independence
- Princely state representation by nominees
- Provincial secession rights → Against national unity
- No immediate power transfer
- Muslim League opposed
- Single Indian Union concept
- Denied self-determination for Pakistan
- Churchill administration undermined Cripps' efforts
- Gandhi called scheme post-dated cheque
- Secession procedure poorly defined, requiring 60% legislative majority
- Cripps returned leaving frustrated and embittered Indian people
23. Quit India Movement, Demand for Pakistan, and the INA
Quit India Movement
- July 14, 1942: Gandhi framed British withdrawal resolution after Cripps' failure
- CWC at Wardha accepted struggle against British
Why Start a Struggle Now
- Cripps Mission failure revealed unchanged British attitude toward Indian self-determination
- Economic hardships, commandeering of resources, possibility of scorched earth policies in eastern India against Japanese advance
- British defeats in Southeast Asia emboldened Indians, shattered colonial prestige
- Discriminatory evacuation policies (Black Road/White Road) exposed racial attitudes
- Condition masses for possible Japanese invasion
The 'Quit India' Resolution
- 1942
-
Congress authorized Gandhi to lead non-violent movement
-
August 8: Ratified at Gowalia Tank (Bombay) and demanded immediate British withdrawal
-
Called for free India to resist fascism, provisional government, civil disobedience
-
Gandhi's Instructions
- Instructions given at Gowalia Tank meeting but not officially issued
- Government servants: Declare allegiance to Congress without resigning
- Soldiers: Remain in army but refuse to fire on compatriots
- Students: Leave studies if confident
- Peasants: Pay rent to supportive zamindars, withhold from anti-government zamindars
- Princes: Support masses and accept people's sovereignty
- Princely states' people: Support ruler only if anti-government
- Gandhi's mantra: "Do or Die" - achieve free India or die trying
Movement Spread
- August 9: All top Congress leaders arrested, organizations (Congress Working Committee, All Indian Congress Committee, Provincial Congress Committee) banned
- Aruna Asaf Ali (1st mayor Delhi) presided over Congress committee session → hoisted flag
- Public attacked authority symbols, infrastructure sabotaged (bridges blown, railway tracks removed, telegraph lines cut)
- Strongest in United Provinces, Bihar; students and workers led protests
Underground Activity
- Multi-faction resistance network (Socialists, Forward Bloc, Gandhi followers)
- Key leaders: Rammanohar Lohia, Jayaprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali, Biju Patnaik (CM → Odisha), Sucheta Kripalani (First woman CM of independent India → UP), Usha Mehta
- Usha Mehta started underground radio in Bombay
- Underground activity maintained morale, provided command line, distributed arms and ammunition
Parallel Governments
- Supported by businessmen, students, villagers, sympathetic officials
| Region | Time Period | Leaders | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballia | August 1942 (one week) | Chittu Pandey | • Released Congress leaders • Took control of local administration |
| Tamluk/Midnapore | December 1942 to September 1944 | Satish Chandra Samanta | • Organized relief work • Sanctioned grants to schools • Distributed paddy from rich to poor • Managed "Jatiya Sarkar" (National Government) |
| Satara | Mid-1943 to 1945 | Y.B. Chavan, Nana Patil | • Organized "Prati Sarkar" (Parallel Government) • Established village libraries • Created Nyayadan Mandals (justice system) • Conducted prohibition campaigns • Performed "Gandhi marriages" |
Extent of Mass Participation
- Youth → Students led movement from forefront
- Women → Active participants included Aruna Asaf Ali, Sucheta Kripalani, Usha Mehta
- Workers → Conducted strikes, faced repression
- Peasants → Central to movement, targeted authority symbols without anti-zamindar violence
- Government officials → Lower-level police and administrators participated → eroded government loyalty
- Muslims → Provided shelter to underground activists, no communal clashes occurred
- Communists → Initially abstained → supported British after Nazi attack on Russia
- Muslim League → Opposed movement fearing Hindu oppression of minorities
- Hindu Mahasabha → Boycotted movement
- Princely states → Showed minimal response
Government Repression
- Severe measures: lathi-charges, tear-gas, firing; estimated 10,000 killed
- Press censored; military control of cities
- Collective village punishment (heavy fines, mass flogging)
Estimate
- Violence spread without leadership; movement centered in eastern provinces
- Students, workers, peasants formed backbone while elites remained loyal
- Established India couldn't be ruled without Indians' consent
- Placed independence as immediate agenda with unprecedented public heroism
Gandhi Fasts
- February 1943: Fast against state violence gained overwhelming support
- Three council members resigned; raised morale, exposed government brutality
March 23, 1943: Pakistan Day observed
Famine of 1943
- 1.5-3 million died in man-made Bengal famine
- Causes
- Diverted foodstuffs for army
- Stopped rice imports
- Gross mismanagement
- Deliberate profiteering
- Belated rationing methods
Rajagopalachari Formula (1944)
- CR proposed Congress-League cooperation framework
- Provisions
- Muslim League to support independence; join provisional government
- Muslim-majority areas to decide on Pakistan through post-war plebiscite
- Joint arrangements for defense/commerce if partition occurred
- Required complete British power transfer
- Jinnah's response: Demanded two-nation theory acceptance, only Muslims to vote in plebiscite
- Congress position: Willing to cooperate for Indian Union integrity but not separate nation
- Hindu leaders under Vir Savarkar: Condemned CR Plan
Desai-Liaqat Pact
- Desai (Congress) and Liaqat (Muslim League) proposed interim government
- Equal Congress-League representation, 20% minority seats
- No settlement reached despite parity agreement
Wavell Plan
- 1945: Churchill government sought India solution as WWII in Europe ended
- Government motivations
- Upcoming UK elections
- Allied pressure for more Indian Cooperation in war
- Redirecting Indian energies to profitable channels
Wavell Plan Proposals
- Executive Council
- All Indians except Governor General and Commander in Chief
- Parties to submit joint list of nominees to executive council; separate lists if no agreement
- Council to function as interim government within 1935 Act framework (not responsible to Central Assembly)
- Equal representation for Caste Hindus and Muslims in council
- Governor General: Retained veto power exercised on advice of ministers
- Future constitution negotiations possible after war
Why Wavell Plan Failed
Muslim League stand
- Demanded exclusive Muslim representation
- Feared reduction to one-third minority if other minorities joined Congress
- Sought two-thirds approval veto for Muslim-related decisions
Congress stand
- Rejected being reduced to purely caste Hindu party
- Insisted on right to nominate members from all communities
Wavell's Mistake
- Announced breakdown of talks, giving League a virtual veto → strengthened League's position, boosted muslim separatism, weakened Churchill's govt
- Boosted Muslim separatism and weakened Churchill's Conservative government
The Indian National Army and Subhas Bose
- Bose: militant nationalist, resigned Civil Services (1921) to join freedom struggle
- Rejected Gandhi's non-violence, sought independent path
- 1940
- March: Organized Anti-Compromise Conference at Ramgarh (joint efffort of Forward Block + Kisan Sabha)
- July: Arrested
- 1941
- Escaped British custody, fled India seeking international support
- Met Hitler in Germany, formed Mukti Sena with Indian POWs
- Established Free India Centre in Berlin, coined Jai Hind slogan
- 1943: Reached Japan via submarine, took INA command from Rashbehari Bose
Origin and First Phase of INA
- Mohan Singh created army from Indian POWs in Malaya
- 40,000 men recruited by end of 1942
- Differences with Japanese led to Mohan Singh's arrest
- 1943:
- July: Subhas Bose assumed INA leadership
- October: Formed Provisional Government for Free India in Singapore
- Declared war on Britain and US, recognized by Axis powers
- Created women's Rani Jhansi Regiment
- 1944
- January: INA headquarters shifted to Rangoon, soldiers were to march from here with war cry "Delhi Chalo"
- March: INA crossed Burma border, reached Indian soil
- April: INA flag hoisted on Indian mainland at Moirang (Manipur)
- May: Japanese retreat ended liberation hopes
- July: Bose addressed Gandhi as Father of the Nation
- August: Japan surrendered, INA surrendered
- August 18, 1945: Bose reportedly died in Taiwan air crash
- INA trials sparked popular defense movement in India